Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 22:55:07 GMT -5
Prepare for your admission exam with our guide to history topics. Studying and learning the Plans and Treaties of the Mexican Revolution can sometimes be a bit confusing; It is common to mix the dates, characters and decrees that each one proposes, this issue can undoubtedly cause problems in your admission exam . The Mexican Revolution is one of the most important topics of the UNAM admission exam , that is why Unitips summarizes its main points, so you can understand it in a simple way and with this better solve your admission exam at UNAM . Plan of San Luis (Francisco I. Madero 1910) The Porfirio Díaz government was ignored. The Supreme Law of “Effective suffrage, no re-election” was declared.
Madero assumed himself as Provisional President Ca Cell Numbers against General Díaz and declared that on November ,they would take up arms to overthrow the Porfirista government. New call to action Ayala Plan (Emiliano Zapata 1911) He disowned Madero as Provisional President and invited his overthrow, along with Porfirio Díaz. He recognized General Pascual Orozco as head of the Liberating Revolution. A third of the land monopolized by the powerful was expropriated. New call to action Plan of Guadalupe (Venustiano Carranza 1913) He ignored General Victoriano Huerta as President of the Republic, and the Legislative and Judicial powers of the Federation.
He ignored the state governments that did not recognize the current government. Venustiano Carranza was named the “First Chief of the Constitutionalist Army.” Agua Prieta Plan (Plutarco Elías Calles He ignored President Venustiano Carranza. New elections were called. A Liberal Constitutionalist Army was created to guarantee the execution of the Plan. Villa Agrarian Law (Francisco Villa, 1915) He declared that the absorption of property by a small group prolongs the precarious situation of the day laborers. He rejected the appropriation of land in the hands of a minority, causing poor agricultural production. He reduced large estates to fair limits, equitably distributing the surplus.