Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 23:14:37 GMT -5
The tension between the Legislative and Executive branches surrounding the legal regime of parliamentary amendments to the public budget tends to intensify when Congress considers the vetoes placed by the President of the Republic on this year's federal Budget Guidelines Law (LDO/).
As the deadline for sanctioning the budget bill for the current year (PLOA/) ended on Monday (/), the vetoes placed on the volume foreseen for such amendments in the General Budget of the Union will also be subject to a deep and structural dispute over the increasingly reduced margin for discretionary deliberation on federal primary expenditures.
The core of the conflict lies in the attempt by congressmen to expand the regime of imposition of parliamentary amendments, through three concomitant strategies:
establishing a budget execution schedule for the B2B Email List amendments, with the assumption of full payment by June of this year;
establishing priority for payment of budget execution of amendments in relation to other discretionary expenses; as well as
prediction that bench amendments would be entitled to a minimum allocation limit equivalent to % of the Union's net current revenue verified in
The escalation of friction is imminent, as the Executive's vetoes on the regime for implementing parliamentary amendments for tend to be overturned by Congress. In the midst of a long war that constitutionally dates back, at least, to Amendment /, this very likely new battlefront aims to both impact municipal elections and maintain the budgetary pendulum on the side of the Legislature .
Spacca
Deputies and senators, as good strategists that they are, know how to have the final say on vetoes and their overturn seems to be just a matter of time, which, in fact, given the narrow electoral calendar already underway, is the most precious asset of the current exercise financial. However, managing the monthly rhythm of budget execution is the exclusive responsibility of the Executive and occurs within the scope of the financial programming decree, to safeguard the achievement of the LDO's primary result target.
According to the Fiscal Responsibility Law, this competence involves the development of bimonthly collection targets (article ) and a monthly disbursement schedule (article ), which must occur within the first days after the promulgation of the LOA. Throughout the year, monitoring of budget execution must be carried out through summary reports published bimonthly (in accordance with article , III of the LRF). If there is a risk of frustration of estimated revenues, primary expenses that are not legal and constitutional obligations (marked by primary result identifier and formally included in Section I of Annex III of LDO/) may be restricted, so that the primary outcome target (article of LC /).
Unlike the mandatory expenses referred to in § of article of the LRF [] , parliamentary amendments, even those that are mandatory in nature (individual and bench amendments), are susceptible to contingency, by virtue of the following § of the article of the Constitution.
As the deadline for sanctioning the budget bill for the current year (PLOA/) ended on Monday (/), the vetoes placed on the volume foreseen for such amendments in the General Budget of the Union will also be subject to a deep and structural dispute over the increasingly reduced margin for discretionary deliberation on federal primary expenditures.
The core of the conflict lies in the attempt by congressmen to expand the regime of imposition of parliamentary amendments, through three concomitant strategies:
establishing a budget execution schedule for the B2B Email List amendments, with the assumption of full payment by June of this year;
establishing priority for payment of budget execution of amendments in relation to other discretionary expenses; as well as
prediction that bench amendments would be entitled to a minimum allocation limit equivalent to % of the Union's net current revenue verified in
The escalation of friction is imminent, as the Executive's vetoes on the regime for implementing parliamentary amendments for tend to be overturned by Congress. In the midst of a long war that constitutionally dates back, at least, to Amendment /, this very likely new battlefront aims to both impact municipal elections and maintain the budgetary pendulum on the side of the Legislature .
Spacca
Deputies and senators, as good strategists that they are, know how to have the final say on vetoes and their overturn seems to be just a matter of time, which, in fact, given the narrow electoral calendar already underway, is the most precious asset of the current exercise financial. However, managing the monthly rhythm of budget execution is the exclusive responsibility of the Executive and occurs within the scope of the financial programming decree, to safeguard the achievement of the LDO's primary result target.
According to the Fiscal Responsibility Law, this competence involves the development of bimonthly collection targets (article ) and a monthly disbursement schedule (article ), which must occur within the first days after the promulgation of the LOA. Throughout the year, monitoring of budget execution must be carried out through summary reports published bimonthly (in accordance with article , III of the LRF). If there is a risk of frustration of estimated revenues, primary expenses that are not legal and constitutional obligations (marked by primary result identifier and formally included in Section I of Annex III of LDO/) may be restricted, so that the primary outcome target (article of LC /).
Unlike the mandatory expenses referred to in § of article of the LRF [] , parliamentary amendments, even those that are mandatory in nature (individual and bench amendments), are susceptible to contingency, by virtue of the following § of the article of the Constitution.