Post by account_disabled on Jan 14, 2024 0:47:49 GMT -5
The effort to reduce the environmental impact has been constant in recent years», states Nestlé in the section Environmental Protection and Management of your web page. “To address climate change, American continues to strive to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 by operating more fuel-efficiently with more efficient aircraft powered by low-carbon fuel,” he guarantees. the CEO of AmericanAirlines in his environmental report of 2021. But is this the truth? Or are they just examples, a few of many, of constant greenwashing? Nestlé and American Airlines are only two of the 24 largest companies in the world that are not keeping their promises despite boast of being examples of neutrality and climate leadership.
All of them only commit to reducing 15% of the emissions in their value chain until 2030. Or even 21% if a realistic interpretation of their commitments is made. These figures, however, represent less than half of the greenhouse gas reduction needed to limit the increase in global temperature to 1.5ºC. And they are not usually real. The results of the WhatsApp Number List second edition of the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor, prepared by NewClimate Institute< /span>; the vast majority of emission sources are excluded from their allegations.3% of its emissions, they claim to be carbon neutral today. But this statement only covers on average MicrosoftandApple, Google , demonstrate a lack of action and an excess of ambiguity.
Half of the companies evaluated, including Carbon Market Watch and “By making such outlandish claims about carbon neutrality, these companies are not only misleading consumers and investors, but they are also exposing themselves to increasing legal and carbon liability.” ," says LindsayOtis, carbon market policy expert at Carbon Market Watch. «Instead, they should implement ambitious climate plans to reduce their own emissions, while financing actions outside their own activities, without claiming that this will make them carbon neutral a>». Summary of companies evaluated in the 2023 Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor None of the companies analyzed fall into the “high integrity” category. Only the Danish brand Maersk manages to achieve the “reasonable integrity” label .
All of them only commit to reducing 15% of the emissions in their value chain until 2030. Or even 21% if a realistic interpretation of their commitments is made. These figures, however, represent less than half of the greenhouse gas reduction needed to limit the increase in global temperature to 1.5ºC. And they are not usually real. The results of the WhatsApp Number List second edition of the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor, prepared by NewClimate Institute< /span>; the vast majority of emission sources are excluded from their allegations.3% of its emissions, they claim to be carbon neutral today. But this statement only covers on average MicrosoftandApple, Google , demonstrate a lack of action and an excess of ambiguity.
Half of the companies evaluated, including Carbon Market Watch and “By making such outlandish claims about carbon neutrality, these companies are not only misleading consumers and investors, but they are also exposing themselves to increasing legal and carbon liability.” ," says LindsayOtis, carbon market policy expert at Carbon Market Watch. «Instead, they should implement ambitious climate plans to reduce their own emissions, while financing actions outside their own activities, without claiming that this will make them carbon neutral a>». Summary of companies evaluated in the 2023 Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor None of the companies analyzed fall into the “high integrity” category. Only the Danish brand Maersk manages to achieve the “reasonable integrity” label .